When the current foreclosure crisis relentlessly hit Nevada, state legislators were quick to create a special mediation court that was aimed at helping troubled homeowners to keep their properties. Now, there are proposals to modify or change some provisions in the policy to make sure more homeowners would take advantage of the program. The changes are also expected to further help those consumers who are already going through the foreclosure process.
The Nevada Supreme Court has started conducting hearings in a packed courtroom within the Regional Justice Center. The court aims to make legal decisions that would help improve foreclosure remediation in the future. However, several attorneys have raised suspicions that some lawyers who act as mediators may be biased. They argued that some lawyers act as mediators in foreclosure cases while they are also serving as adverse party to the involved banks in subsequent cases.
The state court is mulling over proposals to change specific rules in the current Foreclosure Remediation Program implemented in the state. There is a specific proposal to tighten up the current enforcement of a 30-day requirement for a homeowner to respond appropriately to a default notice. If a homeowner does not file a remediation application immediately, there would be fewer lawful options available to him.
The state court is also considering a proposal to give more time to homeowners for appealing mediation decisions. It would logically extend the time required for a homeowner to seek remediation. Banks would be given a stricter new deadline.
Before the Foreclosure Remediation Program was implemented, it usually took just 15 days for a mediation to be finalized. The judicial review is also set within the period. Many homeowners complained that lenders usually did not provide opportunities to hear or even meet them. Thus, the period was extended to 30 days.
Some proponents are also pushing to make lenders present certified title documents in a foreclosure. Recently, numerous homeowners have discovered that most of their documents have been lost by lenders during the previous boom.
There are also proposals to change the name of the program from Remediation Agreement to Temporary Agreement. According to the proponents of the change, this would help prevent confusion about the program among homeowners.
Nevada Supreme Court is expected to make its decision about the proposed changes in several days.
Notice: In accordance with FTC guidelines, we state that RealEstateProArticles.com has financial relationships with some companies and may be compensated if consumers choose to buy, subscribe or take any action to a product or service via the links on our website. Occasionally, we receive free access to review a product or service. We do not accept compensation in exchange for a positive review. These reviews are strictly the opinions of the author.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.realestateproarticles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites